点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
浙江如何让城乡百姓“住有宜居”？******
中新网杭州1月9日电(张煜欢)近五年来，浙江全省城镇化水平稳步提升，城乡融合不断加快，常住人口城镇化率达73%；城镇人均住房面积增长至47.9平方米，城镇住房保障受益覆盖率达22.6%；率先在省域层面实现生活垃圾“零增长、零填埋”，率先全面、全域完成小城镇环境综合整治……
9日，浙江全省住房和城乡建设工作会议在杭州举行，一份有关“安居”的成绩单也随之发布。记者从会上了解到，该省目标今年新增未来社区300个以上，未来乡村200个以上，打造人民幸福美好家园，让更多人实现从住有所居到住有安居再到住有宜居的“安居梦”。
为人民群众安居托底、增进民生福祉是共同富裕的应有之义。浙江省住房和城乡建设厅党组书记、厅长应柏平在会上介绍，过去一年，该省谋划确定“1+3+n”目标任务，打造1项省级重大标志性成果、形成3项省级突破性抓手、推进n项重点工作。该省已累计开展六批783个未来社区创建，完成两批共108个未来社区验收；推进212个城乡风貌样板区试点建设，公布三批111个城乡风貌样板区。
与此同时，该省城乡人居环境品质全面提升，去年浙江新通车城市快速路120公里，整治起伏道路500公里、“桥头跳车”桥梁316座；开工改造城镇老旧小区616个，新增设区市主城区停车位12.3万个，新建城市地下综合管廊23.8公里；新增国家级传统村落65个。建成各类绿道2050公里。
“如何从安居这个基点出发，以完善社区功能为切入口，全省域推进以人为核心的现代化基本单元建设，探索形成一整套从好小区到好社区、从好社区到好城区的路径模式，打造人民幸福美好家园，是住建领域扎实推动共同富裕的新命题。”应柏平说。
会议现场。 浙江省住房和城乡建设厅供图他表示，居住条件是人民生活富裕的重要指标，如何加快推动“让人民群众住有所居”向“更舒适的居住条件”转变，事关人民群众美好生活，事关经济社会发展大局。“新征程上，我们要以实现住有所居、住有安居、住有宜居为梯次愿景，加快建立多主体供给、多渠道保障、租购并举的住房制度，着力提升住房居住品质，更好满足多元化居住需求。”
未来社区方面，今年该省将完善“普惠型+引领型”社区建设标准和全域未来社区试点建设要求，推广单元化更新建设模式，在部分街道或区域推动实现全域覆盖。目标全年新增未来社区300个以上，累计突破1000个，建成150个以上；完成600个以上城乡社区“一老一小”服务场景验收。未来乡村方面，该省目标全年新增未来乡村200个以上。
在城乡风貌整治提升方面，浙江目标全年建成50个城市风貌样板区、30个县域风貌样板区，从中择优公布20个“新时代富春山居图城市样板区”、10个“新时代富春山居图县域样板区”，努力实现“城市让生活更美好、乡村让人们更向往、住房让百姓更满意”。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)